Easwaran J Narassimhan is a Visiting Fellow of climate policy at the Sustainable Futures Collaborative (SFC) in New Delhi, India. He is also a visiting faculty member at the Climate Policy Lab, Fletcher School, Tufts University. Previously, Easwaran was a Fellow at the Centre for Policy Research (CPR) in New Delhi and a Research Fellow at the Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. At SFC, Easwaran focuses on energy technology innovation, green industrialization, and energy transition in emerging economies. He has also worked extensively on climate policy analysis, including studying market-based and non-market-based policy interventions worldwide and identifying policy mixes for low-carbon development in developing countries. Easwaran holds an MA and PhD in International Affairs from The Fletcher School, Tufts University.
Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis | 29 May 2025
Governments are increasingly using green industrial policies to address socio-economic and environmental objectives in the energy transition. But why do countries with similar policy objectives implement different green industrial policy designs?
Climate Policy Journal | 26 November 2024
Using a mixed methodology of expert elicitation and system dynamics modelling, this article examines the policy gap that needs to be bridged for India to realize its net zero by 2070 commitment. The study discusses a socio-economically sensitive policy mix that could set India on a trajectory to peak its emissions in a decade and zero out its carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by mid-century, leaving about one gigaton of other greenhouse gases to be decarbonized by 2070 to meet India’s net-zero goal.
Environmental Research Letters | 7 December 2023
This paper explores which combination of technology-push and demand-pull policies best situates a country to lead in clean energy innovation, as new or dominant designs emerge and replace older technologies. A new analytical framework for green industrial policy is applied to BEV drivetrain technology to examine the use of policy alignment and misalignment by countries with big automakers as they pursue strategic green industrial policy.
The Hindu | 6 February 2023
India’s G-20 presidency is an opportunity for New Delhi to negotiate a deal for itself while also shaping international cooperation on just energy transitions.
Politics and Governance | 17 March 2022
Federal carbon pricing in the US suffers from the lack of any natural and/or consistent constituency to support it through policy development, legislation, and implementation. While interest group politics have been mitigated by good policy entrepreneurship at the subnational level, the lack of policy entrepreneurship and the changing positions of competing interest groups have kept a federal carbon pricing policy from becoming a reality.
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change | 17 August 2021
Global government energy RD&D investments between 2000-2018 are decarbonizing. Nuclear has held steady, fossil fuels have decreased, and clean energy has increased. China and India have now joined the United States and Japan in the ranks of the top four countries overall.
Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy | 1 April 2021
The central purpose of this dissertation is to examine how countries at different stages of economic development address socio-economic objectives through green industrial policies, focusing mainly on the employment implications of their policies. The dissertation draws on interviews with more than 100 experts in China, India, South Africa, and Ethiopia to analyze the employment implications of specific green industrial policy strategies, policy choices, and policy design and the role of government in managing the same.
Energy Research & Social Science | 14 January 2021
This paper investigates why new coal-fired power plants are being financed and built in South and Southeast Asia given that new coal plants without carbon capture and storage are incompatible with a 1.5 °C temperature goal. The paper particularly focuses on developing countries where these coal-fired power plants are being built that are recipients of Chinese government-backed finance.
Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum | 26 July 2018
Carbon taxes and emissions trading systems (ETSs) to limit emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) are increasingly common. At the end of 2015, 17 GHG ETSs were operational in 55 jurisdictions, and 18 jurisdictions collected at least one carbon tax. This paper assesses the performance of carbon taxes and ETSs with respect to environmental effectiveness (reduction of emissions regulated by the instrument), cost-effectiveness (marginal abatement cost), economic efficiency, public finance, and administrative issues.